Current:Home > MyFERC Says it Will Consider Greenhouse Gas Emissions and ‘Environmental Justice’ Impacts in Approving New Natural Gas Pipelines-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
FERC Says it Will Consider Greenhouse Gas Emissions and ‘Environmental Justice’ Impacts in Approving New Natural Gas Pipelines
View Date:2024-12-24 11:09:14
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has issued new policy statements saying its approval process for natural gas pipelines and liquified natural gas facilities will take greenhouse gas emissions and “environmental justice” impacts into consideration in determining whether the infrastructure projects are in the public interest.
Although non-binding, the policy statements, issued last month, could significantly change how natural gas pipelines are approved by the commission going forward. Under its new approach, the commission would be required to determine whether a project is actually needed to meet the energy demands of a given region and whether it is in the public interest, with its benefits outweighing its potential adverse impacts, such as air pollution or threats to groundwater.
Interim guidelines, which have gone into effect but remain open for public comment through April 4 before being finalized, require environmental impact statements for all projects emitting more than 100,000 metric tons of gases every year.
Pipelines and liquified natural gas facilities often release into the atmosphere vast quantities of methane, the main ingredient in natural gas, because of accidents, or during repairs and routine maintenance. Methane is a climate super-pollutant 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide over a 20-year period.
While climate advocacy groups have welcomed FERC’s policy statements, opponents argue that they may have damaging impacts on industry’s ability to transport natural gas and export liquified natural gas, which is produced through an energy-intensive process that requires cooling natural gas to -259 degrees Fahrenheit.
U.S. Sen. John Barraso (R-Wyo.), a leading advocate for the natural gas industry, took aim at the new FERC policy during a March 3 Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing.
“These policies are going to make it next to impossible to build any new natural gas infrastructure or upgrade our existing facilities in the United States,” he said.
Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W. Va.) expressed a similar view at the hearing. “There is an effort underway by some to inflict death by a thousand cuts on the fossil fuels that have made our energy reliable and affordable,” he said.
But Richard Glick, FERC’s chairman, said that the policies came in response to various court decisions in which the commission’s pipeline approvals were vacated because the commission had not sufficiently determined the pipelines were needed by consumers to provide heat and electricity.
Glick said the commission’s approach had evolved into one in which developers’ proposals “were treated as conclusive proof of the need for a proposed project.”
David Wochner, area leader in the law firm K&L Gates’ global policy and regulatory practice, said the heart of FERC’s new policy is its consideration of the climate change impacts from projects’ greenhouse gas emissions.
“They give very little guidance in the interim policy statement on how they are going to go about doing that,” said Wochner.
He and others at the hearing also raised a concern about a lack of clarity going forward for developers about emissions and mitigation methods for reducing them.
But Ted Kelly, a senior attorney for energy markets and regulation at the Environmental Defense Fund, said that the commission’s decision to require mitigation without specifying an exact set of strict rules or emissions reduction methods provides developers with more flexibility based on the nature and scale of a particular project. “My suspicion is they would be much less happy if FERC had put in a very restrictive requirement that said you can only mitigate in this one particular way,” he said.
Although the commission’s new policies do not retroactively apply to already approved projects, they could apply in some cases in which a project may require significant changes.
The Spire STL pipeline, a 66-mile natural gas pipeline in Illinois and Missouri that connects St. Louis to natural gas fields in the Appalachian Basin, received FERC’s approval in 2018 and has been partly operational since. But Spire’s approval was vacated by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in June 2021. Spire is the fifth largest publicly traded natural gas company in America.
The court held that the commission did not sufficiently determine whether the Spire STL pipeline was needed in the market or was in the public interest. The pipeline, which is fully built and transporting natural gas, must now undergo a review under the commission’s new policies.
Kelly said he believes there is at least a chance that the commission may find that the pipeline should not have been approved in the first place. “That’s going to be a very complicated situation because the pipeline is already in the ground,” he said.
But he said that it could take months for the commission to complete its review of the pipeline, and even longer for its policies’ larger impact on natural gas infrastructure to come into play.
veryGood! (72)
Related
- Repair Hair Damage In Just 90 Seconds With This Hack from WNBA Star Kamilla Cardoso
- Attorneys say other victims could sue a Mississippi sheriff’s department over brutality
- 32 things we learned in NFL Week 3: These QB truths can't be denied
- Volunteers help seedlings take root as New Mexico attempts to recover from historic wildfire
- South Carolina lab recaptures 5 more escaped monkeys but 13 are still loose
- Southeast US under major storm warning as hurricane watch issued for parts of Cuba and Mexico
- Chiefs RB Carson Steele makes his first NFL start on sister's wedding day
- She exposed a welfare fraud scandal, now she risks going to jail | The Excerpt
- Brian Kelly asks question we're all wondering after Alabama whips LSU, but how to answer?
- Search resumes for 2 swimmers who went missing off the coast of Virginia Beach
Ranking
- New Yorkers vent their feelings over the election and the Knicks via subway tunnel sticky notes
- Horoscopes Today, September 22, 2024
- Texas death row inmate Travis Mullis, 'consumed by shame and madness,' killed baby son
- Man serving life for Alabama murder also sentenced in Wisconsin killing
- Arbitrator upholds 5-year bans of Bad Bunny baseball agency leaders, cuts agent penalty to 3 years
- Boeing makes a ‘best and final offer’ to striking union workers
- Runaway cockatiel missing for days found in unlikely haven: A humane society CEO's backyard
- University of California accused of labor violations over handling of campus protests
Recommendation
-
How Leonardo DiCaprio Celebrated His 50th Birthday
-
Kim Kardashian Reveals What's Helping Kids North West and Saint West Bond
-
US Naval Academy says considering race in admissions helps create a cohesive military
-
Golden Block Services PTY LTD: English Courts recognizes virtual currency as property and the legal status of cryptocurrency is clear!
-
How to Build Your Target Fall Capsule Wardrobe: Budget-Friendly Must-Haves for Effortless Style
-
Kentucky judge allegedly killed by sheriff remembered for public service as residents seek answers
-
Colorado men tortured their housemate for 14 hours, police say
-
North Carolina absentee ballots are being distributed following 2-week delay